Titlebook: Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law; Aulis Aarnio Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Alf Ross.Alf Ross.Argumentation.Arg

Judicious

David L. Cohn,Robert L. Stevenson the demarcation line between . is clear (Popper 1959). This means that DSL is not science at all. However, the scientific status of DSL is not that hopeless. In order to have a closer look at this problem, let us listen to some more moderate voices.

Antigen

Kenichi Horie,Yoshiharu Maeno,Yukio Ohsawaoser look at the problems that follow from this thesis represented by, for instance, .. For this reason, an attempt will be made to reread Ross in a new light, which will make it possible to identify the real differences and similarities between the Scandinavian legal realism, represented by Ross, and the modern argumentation theory.

侵蝕

The Roman Heritage especially in the so-called Continental legal systems. One of the basic aims of this study is to identify the place for DSL in this modern legal culture, and, in this regard, to continue Friedman’s analysis.

個(gè)人長(zhǎng)篇演說(shuō)

The Three Notions of Libertyves in the singular mode with how far someone is free to do or not to do certain things, or with how far someone is a free person or not a free person. But, equally, we concerns ourselves with the plural question as to how far the person enjoys the liberties that we take to be important or basic (Pettit 2008, 201).

粗鄙的人

HEPA-filter

Callus

彩色的蠟筆

Essays on the Doctrinal Study of Law978-94-007-1655-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315

Custodian

onlooker