Titlebook: Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos; R. S. Cohen,P. K. Feyerabend,M. W. Wartofsky Book 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

是消毒

書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos被引頻次




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos年度引用




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos讀者反饋




書目名稱Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

終點

無目標(biāo)

Headstrong

Natural Resource Management and Policyart of my job should be to give a portrait of Lakatos’ personal manner. This would be informative from the point of view of history of thought, as it would help people read his works with greater understanding. And it would be interesting, if I succeeded at all: everyone who knew Lakatos would agree

hysterectomy

LAVA

LAVA

嫌惡

Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in Europe.e., of Western culture from the vantage point of science. There are many intellectual histories from different points of view: the most easily acceptable are those of political and social ideas and institutions -some emphasize the central importance of religion, others the deep social role of the a

GROVE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4948-5of relation between research programmes and the evidence. Let me call these types type . and type . respectively. They examine episodes where one research programme . replaces another research programme, . (or fails to be replaced by it), i.e. . is made the basis of research, argument, metaphysical

偏離