Titlebook: Ernst Mach – Life, Work, Influence; Friedrich Stadler Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license t

顯示

dapper

Some Remarks on Mach’s Philosophical Doctrinesof economy. Are these views jointly consistent? I argue that the role of naturalism, prominent in the endorsement of the evolutionary theory, creates an unresolved tension among those views. Phenomenalism in particular is deeply revisionary. It appears to be a remnant of empiricist metaphysics casti

弓箭

Mach’s Post-Kantian Empiricism. For a New Concept of Givennesspt of givenness, construed as the irreducible experience of what happens (events): thus his post-Kantian empiricism turns out to be singular in the history of occidental philosophy. Neither logical givenness (Marburg School) nor operative concept, the meaning of which depends on the global context (

打算

The Transdisciplinary Legacy of Ernst Mach: From the Analysis of Sensations to the GPS Inside the Brtaphysics. This paper attempts to draw together the threads of Mach’s thought that anticipate present day insights such as the functioning of the hippocampus and contingent cortical modules, innate spatial maps and the innate structures of the developing mind that lead to innate proclivities underly

專橫

Economical Unification in Philosophy of Science Before and After Ernst Mach. Mach’s criticism of Newtonian absolute time and space was in line with positivism, and his suggestions about an overall holistic world-view were to function as an intuitive background for the new physics. Thus, as a physicist and a philosopher of physics, Mach should be seen primarily as a unifier

Ointment

0929-6328 eud), to literature (Jung Wien, R. Musil), to politics (F. Adler, Austro-Marxism and the Viennese adult education), to arts between Futurism and Minimal Art as well as to social sciences between the liberal sch978-3-030-04378-0Series ISSN 0929-6328 Series E-ISSN 2215-1818

整理

Rodney J. Allam,Rune Bredesen,Enrico Drioliofar as the latter rejected thought economy as a principle of theoretical rationality, whereas the former conceived of it as a principle of practical rationality. This is further supported by their correspondingly different readings of the so-called principle of the permanence of forms.

課程

Talking Past Each Other: Mach and Husserl on Thought Economyofar as the latter rejected thought economy as a principle of theoretical rationality, whereas the former conceived of it as a principle of practical rationality. This is further supported by their correspondingly different readings of the so-called principle of the permanence of forms.

iodides

Nuno M. Xavier,Amélia P. Rauter,Yves QueneauGraz and Experimental Physics in Prague, took over the chair for “Philosophy, particularly for the History and Theory of the Inductive Sciences”, at the University of Vienna in 1895. This turn from the natural sciences to philosophy was really an exception in the academic field..Given his strong as

conquer