Titlebook: Eric Rohmer; Film as Theology Keith Tester Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2008 argue.atmosphere.c

Gudgeon

Bob Lingard,Wayne Martino,Martin Millseur actors, letting them wear their own clothes (or carefully made selections from their own wardrobes) and filming in the street is a remarkably cheap way of working. For example, Rohmer estimated that . cost less than ￡100,000 to produce (Lennon 1992). Fortuitously — or not — the economic implicat

Affection

Boys and Foreign Language Learning, Crisp reports that ten years were needed to put together the funding for ., and that although it took only seven weeks to shoot the whole film, there had been a year of rehearsals (Crisp 1988: 85). It is obvious that the deliberate pictorial references of . were the result of very long and detaile

ANT

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590700 small part due to the commercial and critical failure of ., which had secured neither revenue nor an audience, and the situation was exacerbated in 1963 when Rohmer rather acrimoniously left the staff of ., having been co-editor of the journal since 1958. He was pushed aside by Jacques Doniol-Valcr

膽汁

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620711 Even philosophers wish for them’ (Pascal 1931: 46). Many film-makers want to have admirers too, and by the time Rohmer had come to the conclusion of the series of ., he was lauded and applauded by those who knew his work. He had his admirers. The audiences for the films were becoming larger and pri

大約冬季

Serenity

LATHE

ment with his work in which Keith Tester argues that Rohmer is not the naIve realist he is often claimed to be. Instead,?his films are revealed as a sustained exercise in Catholic theology.978-1-349-54546-9978-0-230-58204-0

Immunoglobulin

maverick

Book 2008Since the 1950s Eric Rohmer has been one of the major presences in French cinema as critic and director. This book is a sophisticated engagement with his work in which Keith Tester argues that Rohmer is not the naIve realist he is often claimed to be. Instead,?his films are revealed as a sustained exercise in Catholic theology.

全神貫注于