Titlebook: Equality; John Rees Textbook 1971Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1971 equality.political science.political theory.politics.qua

memoir

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Equality讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

尋找

停止償付

擔(dān)心

Political Equality: II,oss maldistribution of wealth as merely superficial. No amount of ingenuity in the devising of electoral machinery, it would claim, can compensate for the profound inequalities which stem from and go with the minority control and ownership of society’s productive instruments.

Dissonance

Is Political Equality Possible?,t also arises in important ways in political and social philosophy. A number of philosophers have asserted that an unbridgeable logical gap prevents us moving validly from ‘is’ to ‘ought’ and in discussions about equality we are often warned that no collection of alleged facts about human nature or

Adulterate

Equality and Elites,an situation. It is one of the concerns of political theory to determine when government, or a political system, can be said to exist; whether relationships of power and authority are both necessary and sufficient for the existence of a political system. Robert A. Dahl, for example, is prepared to d

Adulterate

植物茂盛

防止

jaunty

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02239-6men have generally regarded inequalities in wealth, prestige, and power as ‘a(chǎn)n unalterable fact’ and that it has only been since the eighteenth century, when the great revolutions in America and France gave stimulus to such enquiry, that serious study has been made of the phenomenon of social class