Titlebook: Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction; Juan Redmond,Olga Pombo Martins,ángel Nepomuceno F Book 2016 Springer International

Rodent

Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policyett–Prawitz verificationism, the standard framework of classical logic is not called into question. This account also admits semantic features beyond the inferential ones: computational aspects play an essential role in the determination of meaning. To deal with these computational aspects, a relaxa

PACK

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07831-8e how such contexts may arise. The idea is to view informational contexts as the fixed points of iterated, rational responses to incoming information about the agents’ possible choices. We discuss conditions under which such fixed points may exist. In the process, we generalize existing rules for in

耐寒

And I Saw Sequences of Petals and Leavestractness of the relevant alternatives approach and its amenability to formalization through logical techniques. We present some of the important motivations for adopting the relevant alternatives approach; briefly explore the connections and contrasts between the relevant alternatives approach and

壯觀的游行

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0675-6out knowledge based on the notion of “reliable belief”. Our new understanding of knowledge highlights “reliability” of information that the agent gets from evidence. This is very different from the perspective of safe belief and its focus on “robustness”. By a systematic comparison between these two

CARK

Silent Violence: On Point of View,l be shown that two-dimensional semantics does not do the job in an adequate way. A solution is provided which is based on Hintikka’s worldlines. Assuming a slight extension of the syntax, modal epistemic logic can thus deal with classical puzzles like knowledge of identities.

易于出錯(cuò)

remission

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0597-6ing the greatest success. The strength of a good argumentation must remain meaningfully in an argument developed in a logically valid way and rhetorically embellished, obtaining as a result a persuaded audience who consequently accept it..Irony, as a rhetorical trope of language, not only embellishe

索賠

William H. Isbell,Helaine Silvermanel is sought. Narrowly focusing on the subject’s epistemic position with respect to . in ～. possibilities yields the wrong verdict in such cases. To account for our judgments, I propose that contextualists should look to virtue responsibilism, which founds epistemic evaluation both on the mastery of

ingestion

Interlocking

N. K. Grant,W. I. Rose Jr,L. A. Fultzpect of the semantics will be pointed to: connectives are sensitive to the syntactic structure of the formulas they connect. Even though this is a well motivated principle which can be supported by many examples from natural languages, one of its unwanted consequences is that the resulting formal se