Titlebook: Epistemology, Context, and Formalism; Franck Lihoreau,Manuel Rebuschi Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 STIT lo

偶像

progestogen

Context as Assumptions,ndence has to fulfill. Indexicals in the narrow sense are distinguished from the much more common contextuals. While indexicals proper semantically depend on a possibly shifted deictic center given by the context of a possible utterance, the broader class of contextuals are marked for and subject to

牢騷

averse

A Contradiction for Contextualism?,ontext of the attributor. There have been recently quite a number of objections to contextualism. One objection, however, has not been discussed much at all even though it might be the most serious one so far: the so-called “Factivity Objection” according to which contextualism is inconsistent at it

extract

Epistemic Contexts and Indexicality,ty of an indexical interpretation of the knowledge operator, according to which the truth of knowledge attributions exhibit a contextual variability in such a way that knowledge in one context does not entail knowledge in every context. By means of a notion of epistemic context defined on the basis

意外的成功

Salivary-Gland

How Context Dependent Is Scientific Knowledge?,epted in science. However, this influence is limited in ways that prevent it from threatening the reliability of scientific knowledge. When practical applications put higher demands on reliability than the demands of knowledge per se, then the criteria for acceptance of the knowledge claims in quest

媽媽不開心

實(shí)施生效

Belief, Intention, and Practicality: Loosening Up Agents and Their Propositional Attitudes,reat belief as a family of loosely related modalities. This approach to belief, along with mechanisms for constructing modalities and for activating a modality that is appropriate for a specific reasoning situation, seems to provide a much better model of the relation of belief to intention in delib

多樣