Titlebook: Epistemology I; Peter M. Burkholder Book 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1968 epistemology.knowledge.mind.object

不正常

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Epistemology I讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

蘆筍

peering at and poking an ink-bottle). Nevertheless, in spite of his opinion that it is important, Malcolm has not given a detailed analysis of the strong sense of "know." Thus we may be justified in studying it, first to determine exactly what it is, and then to evaluate it. I do not, of course, wish to sugge978-90-247-0291-6978-94-010-3441-8

責(zé)任

Knowing in the Strong Sense,n, in this sense, is an item of information rather than a person, a poem, a physical object, or a skill. According to Malcolm, this sense of “know” is important and useful. Philosophers have had it “in mind when they have spoken of ‘perfect’ ‘metaphysical’ or ‘strict’ certainty” (KC, 70). Moreover,

cacophony

WITH

, and Knowledge,. have experiences categorized as “physical,” “appetitive,” “emotional,” or “non-rational” begun to receive serious philosophical consideration — by existentialists, phenomenologists and metaphysicians of process, all of whom could trace their genesis back to that epochmaking treatise. Nevertheless,

Facilities

Absent Objects,e knowledge process. No situation is entirely open and this is especially true of problems which are restricted in scope because they carry with them a range of possible solutions. In difficult cases — those which are found in epistemology for instance — it is important for the investigator to know

Facilities

調(diào)味品

Conceptual Models in Knowledge, one would be hard-pressed to find a piece of perceptual knowledge free of all concepts or a piece of conceptual knowledge free of all percepts. Even if one could find perceptual knowledge free of concepts, he could not utter it, for words usually name concepts. With the exception of proper names an

深淵

The Analytic, the Synthetic, and C. I. Lewis,ics which cover all supposedly empirical philosophies, the distinction between the a priori, analytic, non-factual statement on the one hand, and the a posteriori, synthetic, factual statement on the other, has recently been taken to offer the most inclusive characteristic of empiricism, being calle

歡樂(lè)東方