找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Pluralism; Annalisa Coliva,Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 47916|回復(fù): 49
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:41:01 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism
編輯Annalisa Coliva,Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/314/313311/313311.mp4
概述Is the first edited collection solely focussed on epistemic pluralism.Investigates connections between epistemic pluralism and other epistemological paradigms.Shows how epistemic pluralism will serve
叢書(shū)名稱Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Epistemic Pluralism;  Annalisa Coliva,Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex
描述.This book examines epistemic pluralism, a brand new area of research in epistemology with dramatic implications for the discipline. Challenging traditional assumptions about the nature of justification, an expert team of contributors explores pluralism about justification, with compelling first-order results – including analysis of the various requisites one might want to impose on the notion of justification (and therefore of knowledge) and why. It is shown why a long-lasting dispute within epistemology about the nature of justification has reached a stalemate and how embracing a different overarching outlook might lead to progress and aid better appreciation of the relationship between the various epistemic projects scholars have been pursuing.. .With close connections to the idea of epistemic relativism, and with specific applications to various areas of contemporary epistemology (such as the debate over epistemic norms of action and assertion, epistemic peers‘ disagreement, self-knowledge and the status of philosophical disputes about ontology) this fascinating new volume is essential reading for scholars, researchers and advanced students in the discipline..
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Epistemology; Pluralism; Justification; Knowledge; Relativism
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65460-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88034-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-65460-7Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
issn_series 2946-2851
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Epistemic Pluralism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:15:33 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:27:04 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:53:56 | 只看該作者
How to Be a Pluralist About Self-Knowledgedorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:20:31 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:41:15 | 只看該作者
2946-2851 nt, self-knowledge and the status of philosophical disputes about ontology) this fascinating new volume is essential reading for scholars, researchers and advanced students in the discipline..978-3-319-88034-1978-3-319-65460-7Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:54:22 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7936-9 do two things. First, I explain why the distinction between epistemic monism and epistemic pluralism is most interestingly drawn at the level of non-derivative epistemic goods. Second, I make the observation that, at a very fundamental level, the varieties of epistemic pluralism presented in Sect.?
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:43:55 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:52:33 | 只看該作者
L. Szilágyi,S. M. Szilágyi,Z. Benyóhe locality of rational evaluation (in conjunction with a reasonable appreciation of epistemic diversity) commits the Wittgenstenian to a further epistemic incommensurability thesis. Next, Duncan Pritchard’s (e.g. 2009; 2015) novel attempt to save the hinge epistemologist from a commitment to episte
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:04:35 | 只看該作者
Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Controldorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 23:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
张掖市| 正蓝旗| 聊城市| 兴仁县| 潜江市| 龙门县| 邻水| 庆安县| 乐都县| 习水县| 慈利县| 汝南县| 平潭县| 旬阳县| 沙田区| 星座| 武安市| 息烽县| 辽宁省| 新丰县| 大埔区| 黄平县| 双辽市| 杭州市| 重庆市| 浮山县| 五大连池市| 崇信县| 吉隆县| 东海县| 女性| 杨浦区| 田东县| 黄龙县| 龙里县| 万载县| 乌鲁木齐县| 迭部县| 南涧| 阳曲县| 信丰县|