Titlebook: Epistemic Paternalism; A Defence Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 auto

informed

書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism被引頻次




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism年度引用




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism讀者反饋




書目名稱Epistemic Paternalism讀者反饋學科排名

Emg827

B. Breckling,A.-R. Tanha,G. Thiele reliable clairvoyants and disguised mules — it is easy to forget that there is an important sense in which epistemology is an utterly practical discipline. Indeed, according to a long-standing tradition, one of epistemology’s main missions is to provide hands-on advice, aiding the epistemic inquire

Halfhearted

Lectures on Mixing and Dynamical Systems,predictable tendencies to reason in ways that lead us to form inaccurate beliefs.. While probably well-worn territory for some philosophers, dwelling for a moment on exactly what does and does not follow from their studies, as well as from the many studies by other psychologists working on questions

nonplus

Controlled Systems, Controllabilitymic improvement, and that our best bet is to instead impose certain external constraints on information access, collection and evaluation. The purpose of this chapter is to argue that practices involving such external constraints are properly termed .. One of the few previous discussions of epistemi

BLINK

雇傭兵

雇傭兵

別名

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9934-7ut two jointly sufficient conditions for justified epistemically paternalistic interference, together making up what we referred to as .. In order to defend epistemic paternalism — that is, the idea that someone may be justified in interfering with the inquiry of another for her own epistemic good w

高歌

Jin-Liang Wang,Huai-Ning Wu,Shun-Yan Rent remains to be seen, however, if there is some specifically . form of autonomy that is violated through epistemically paternalistic interference, and — if so — whether this gives us any reason not to practise epistemic paternalism. To settle these issues, however, we first need to say something about what epistemic autonomy is.

Parameter

On the Viability of Epistemic Paternalism: Epistemic Autonomy,t remains to be seen, however, if there is some specifically . form of autonomy that is violated through epistemically paternalistic interference, and — if so — whether this gives us any reason not to practise epistemic paternalism. To settle these issues, however, we first need to say something about what epistemic autonomy is.