Titlebook: Epistemic Justification and the Skeptical Challenge; Hamid Vahid Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

palliate

我沒有強(qiáng)迫

Skepticism and Underdeterminationciple of underdetermination. While acknowledging the plausibility of a restricted version of the knowledge version, it shall be argued that this has nothing to do with facts involving underdetermination.

CLOWN

Argument from Epistemic Conservatism theories of justification to problems such as the underdetermination of theories by data, one can primarily regard it as an anti-skeptical strategy whose most widely held form upholds that the mere holding of a belief confers justification on that belief.

HAVOC

油氈

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/313308.jpg

LATE

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596214concept; knowledge; semantic; skepticism; underdetermination; understanding

BLUSH

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17670-8tions involving its own nature and characteristics are still very much matters of dispute. The situation has further been aggravated by the recent controversy over the internalist/externalist character of justification with both sides of the debate taking their cues from what they consider to be the nature of that concept.

數(shù)量

蛛絲

的染料

of key responses to the skeptical challenge, Hamid Vahid presents a theory which is shown to work alongside the internalism/externalism issue and the thesis of semantic externalism, with a deontological conception of justification at its core.978-0-230-59621-4