Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

Basal-Ganglia

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44602-4Epistemic justification; Democratic legitimacy; Experts; Truth; Decision-making; John Rawls; Political nih

鋼筆記下懲罰

無效

鞭打

Ivan CerovacBuilds an innovative structure than can be used to bring order to numerous accounts of epistemic democracy.Critically engages with the main theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation

Supplement

Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/313302.jpg

AVERT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this book.

簡略

圓錐

Introduction,truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo

掙扎

medium

The Knowledge Tenet,e knowledge tenet (i.e. claim that there are no experts in politics). Proponents of Pragmatist Deliberative Democracy thus claim that political decisions can be right or wrong, and that we should evaluate the decision-making system by its ability to produce correct decisions. However, since the rele