找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Fixate
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:36:18 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:21:43 | 只看該作者
2946-2738 theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation.This compelling new book explores whether the ability of democratic procedures to produce correct outcomes increases the legitimacy of such political decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy,
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:16:58 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:19:23 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2akers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality should go deeper than just the formal politics, rejecting Estlund’s view and claiming that the informal political sphere (e.g. contributions to political campaigns) should be more egalitarian as well.
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:34:42 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24046-2truth value? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decisions should have political authority over others? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this bo
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:16:15 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:10:48 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:37:56 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 19:15:42 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02264-1ld not give greater political authority to any specific group of citizens. This can be claimed only if one adopts a non-monistic account of political legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:03:00 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85583-2cal labor should be implemented, with citizens and their representatives setting the aims and values the society is to pursue, and experts and policymakers devising means (laws and decisions) for the achievement of these aims. In the second part of the chapter I discuss whether political equality sh
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 15:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
深水埗区| 宁安市| 佛冈县| 洛扎县| 洪洞县| 兴国县| 榆树市| 顺平县| 广东省| 廊坊市| 奉化市| 瓦房店市| 武定县| 调兵山市| 璧山县| 化德县| 凤翔县| 商河县| 屏东市| 苍南县| 南江县| 子洲县| 瑞安市| 磐石市| 榆树市| 金山区| 合山市| 延川县| 饶阳县| 泰顺县| 辽阳县| 云梦县| 江北区| 融水| 桃园市| 南郑县| 新津县| 青海省| 化德县| 姚安县| 宝鸡市|