Titlebook: Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis; Contributions from t Vincent T. Covello,Jeryl L. Mumpower,V. R.

欲望

negotiable

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137439710ent approaches. As part of this effort, social and behavioral scientists have produced a substantial body of knowledge on public risk perceptions, attitudes, and behavior (see Covello. 1983). The purpose of this paper is to identify and describe five critical policy uses for such information (see Ta

dapper

Bridges to Fantasy: , and Genre,lel paths, at times drawing procedures from each other, and sometimes being used in the same inquiry. Both are concerned with the well-being of the environment and with the human condition, so it is natural to make comparisons between them looking for similarities and differences. At the present tim

創(chuàng)作

不透明

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9249-6ieves itself to be under threat or strategically vulnerable. Public health budgets grow when there is a major epidemic—especially when politically influential groups are endangered. Economic growth is the driving engine but its resources move upwards and leftwards under threat. Once a country is rea

橫條

,East Meets West – Cultural Hybridity,ing problem. Engineering safety factors were and still are a basic feature of the design of any structure, and these safety factors were institutionalized into codes and standards. Those risks which remained inherent in engineering designs were considered to be tolerable residuals, and were not expl

falsehood

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70634-9Analysis; environment; health; management; research; risk analysis; risk assessment; landscape/regional and

theta-waves

CAMEO

Yag-Capsulotomy