Titlebook: Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose; Umberto Albarella Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2001 Earth Science.archae

一起平行

CHOP

Environmental Archaeology is not Human PalaeoecologyAn alternative view is that environmental archaeology should be considered as the analysis of “natural” materials from archaeological sites, and that the subdiscipline is characterised by the importance of taphonomy and middle range theory, and not by any particular high level theoretical stance. Th

GOAD

Environmental Archaeology is Dead: Long Live Bioarchaeology, Geoarchaeology and Human Palaeoecologysked so very politely — but insistently — by the editor to write a brief commentary on Jonathan Driver’s provocative article on the nature of environmental archaeology, I am resolved to try to do my best — and my briefest.

Notorious

A Reply to Thomasth him before I wrote my paper, because I think we are speaking at cross purposes to some extent, perhaps reflecting some differences between British and Canadian conceptualisations of archaeology. I have been influenced by Bruce Trigger’s analysis of the different levels of archaeological generalis

桉樹

infantile

Commercialising the Palaeoenvironmentd cycle is outlined and the ways in which environmental archaeology has been integrated into the various stages is discussed. An attempt is made to highlight some of the problems and misunderstandings that often occur and some possible solutions are offered. In particular the need to establish prope

Laconic

photophobia

A Reply to Graves-Brownto see any development or change as intrinsically better/preferable to another. This includes loss of species or introduction of species or, for example, the change of an essentially rural, intimate landscape to a transport corridor with warehouses, car parks and filling stations. However, as Paul s

Obstacle

Jargon