Titlebook: Enhancing European Security; Living in a Less Nuc Ian M. Cuthbertson,David Robertson Book 1990 Institute for East-West Security Studies 199

格子架

The Politics of Cultural Policy in Frances been recognized that assessing force ratios in Europe is incredibly difficult. After all, MBFR bogged down for years over the methodological problem of how many troops the Warsaw Pact actually . in Europe, rather than the substantive issue of what ratio of asymmetry should be applied in reducing t

破裂

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288713 ratified and the CFE talks have begun. However, trying to take account of our own concerns about such analyses, we intend to pursue a slightly unusual tack. Instead of predicating our analysis on either the ‘surprise-attack’ or the ‘European deployment’ basis, we shall take the total troop and equi

一起平行

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230358751does not seriously invite such a simplistic answer. It is a question about differential estimates of the value of European peace versus other interests. There are imaginable steps that could be taken to reduce drastically the risk of a war in Europe which one or both superpowers might prefer not to

FUME

獨行者

領(lǐng)先

etries directly. If the disparity in tanks — 12 700 for NATO, 18 000 for the WTO — is really dangerous, NATO could buy more tanks. The alliance would not need to buy an equal number of tanks, because even the most pessimistic military force planner must accept the existence of . advantage for the si

cancellous-bone

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78908-8ous meanings. Before it is lost forever to the English language we wish to use the word in its more familiar environment, that of the improvement of conventional military forces. It must immediately be recognized that we are using modernization as a portmanteau word here, to cover a variety of diffe

palliate

莊嚴(yán)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19958-7he European theater, however defined. Such an approach has two principal aims. One is to reduce the risk of war in both the short and the medium term, because if armaments and armies are roughly equal, an aggressor is deterred from attacking by the low probability of victory. The second is to limit

Vasoconstrictor