Titlebook: Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Irrigation; A Socio-Technical Ap Julian Sagebiel,Christian Kimmich,Vivek Gilani Book 2016 The Author(s) 2016

樹木中

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02096-6esults from an evaluation of the project, with technical data indicating actual observed improvements in power factor and other important parameters, accompanied by a marginal abatement cost analysis. Section?. is more narrative in form, discussing the main observations made by the project team rega

Fecal-Impaction

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326386nergy savings and reduced carbon dioxide emissions. In this chapter, we discuss alternatives for upscaling of this project in India, including regional upscaling (i.e., extend the project to other areas), technical upscaling (i.e., increase the number of technologies used), and political upscaling (

夾死提手勢

遺傳學(xué)

提煉

Project Steps in DetailThis chapter illustrates relevant steps within the pilot project’s chronology, the timeframe of which ranged from October 2011 to June 2013. The sections are organised into three chronological phases: preparation and planning, implementation and evaluation.

Meander

Conclusions and OutlookThe final chapter of this SpringerBrief summarizes the project details and outcomes. It briefly discusses further steps that farmers, utilities and governments could undertake to increase energy efficiency in agriculture, thereby reducing electrical energy consumption and CO. emissions.

悠然

Introduction The chapter starts with an introduction to the power sector in India, and Andhra Pradesh in particular, discussing its major challenges. Then, a brief overview of the agricultural power supply situation is given, followed by a short description of possible remedies to the currently existing low-equ

Brittle

Mutter

Strategies and Existing Projects energy supply. Such projects may be initiated by state governments, foreign development agencies, or are community driven. Projects with high budgets have often focused on large-scale technical interventions, where participation of local stakeholders is not required. In contrast, projects with low

placebo-effect