Titlebook: English for Writing Research Papers; Adrian Wallwork Book 20111st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

小官

Introductionate how the findings of the paper are an advance on current knowledge in the field. A key skill is to be able to say the same things that have been said many times before but in a different, interesting, intriguing way.

crease

Review of the Literatureding the sequence of events leading up to the current situation - not too much to make it tedious, nor too little so that the context of your research is not meaningful to them. The background information is useful because it allows you to:

啜泣

Book 20111st editioners from journal editors on reasons why papers written by non-native researchers are rejected due to problems with English usage. It draws on English-related errors from around 5000 papers written by non-native authors, 500 abstracts by PhD students, and over 1000 hours of teaching researchers how t

人類

es make when reviewing papers for possible publication in in.Publishing your research in an international journal is key to your success in academia. This guide is based on a study of referees‘ reports and letters from journal editors on reasons why papers written by non-native researchers are rejec

興奮過(guò)度

Anastasia Powell,Asher Flynn,Lisa Sugiurathe paper. They may thus feel that they are not in a position to judge the merits of your paper. Just two or three ambiguous sentences are enough for referees to recommend delaying publication until ‘the English has been revised by a native speaking expert’.

sparse

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54984-6 judge the paper in its entirety ? a reader to identify quickly what the paper is about, to judge how relevant it is to their interests, and so to decide whether they should buy / read the whole paper or not. This process is sometimes known as ‘screening’ ? information managers (e.g. librarians) to put it in their indexes

adhesive

Avoiding Ambiguity and Vaguenessthe paper. They may thus feel that they are not in a position to judge the merits of your paper. Just two or three ambiguous sentences are enough for referees to recommend delaying publication until ‘the English has been revised by a native speaking expert’.

cruise

APO

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137514714diagnostic, and therapeutic markers. With the development of drugs that target the specific epigenetic mechanisms involved in the regulation of gene expression, development and utilization of epigenetic tools are an appropriate and effective approach that can be clinically applied to the treatment of various diseases.