Titlebook: English Romanticism; The Grounds of Belie John Clubbe,Ernest J. Lovell Book 1983 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Lim

Flounder

Cultivate

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347809dmaster of the Hawkshead Grammar School, so beloved by him, was an Anglican clergyman. His uncle William Cookson, himself a clergyman, destined him for the Anglican clergy, and as late as May 1792 the poet could write, ‘it is at present my intention to take orders in the approaching winter or spring

Flatter

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101647ve as sometimes to amount to plagiarism, nor that his most famous critical work, ., is also one of the most disorderly books ever to be published in English, nor even that parts of it are written in a style almost unreadable. (Byron compared him in the Dedication to . to a hunting hawk released for

epicondylitis

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601130e true existence and the nature of a genuine ., for Coleridge did not know of Blake until 1818 and Wordsworth does not mention him at all in his letters.. Conversely, no two major poets of the period discussed poetry more often or at greater length than Wordsworth and Coleridge, each stimulating the

RECUR

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312310on us — life as the word is commonly or vulgarly used, a thing distinct from literature. Relatively, and by contrast with the red blood of this life, Byron’s purely literary judgments may seem pale indeed. After looking over the audience at Covent Garden one evening and seeing there ‘the most distin

高度贊揚(yáng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25078-1poetry shrill’.. In Shelley’s prose, however, one finds repeatedly the shrillest of tones, and it does no one any good to point out the same shrill tone in some of his worst, propagandistic poems. The remarkable quality that distinguishes Shelley among the major Romantic poets is not any singleness

palliative-care

貞潔

不確定

凹處

Blake, Wordsworth and Coleridge: A Preliminary Synthesis,e true existence and the nature of a genuine ., for Coleridge did not know of Blake until 1818 and Wordsworth does not mention him at all in his letters.. Conversely, no two major poets of the period discussed poetry more often or at greater length than Wordsworth and Coleridge, each stimulating the other to new creative efforts and conclusions.