Titlebook: Endogenous Public Policy and Contests; Gil S. Epstein,Shmuel Nitzan Book 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007 Contests.Endogenous P

Limpid

Prizes (Size and Distribution) and Effortshe contestants and the nature of the information they have) affect their equilibrium efforts and the extent of relative prize dissipation, Hillman and Riley (1989), Hurley and Shogren (1998), Konrad (2002), Nitzan (1994) and Nti (1997). In addition, attention has been paid to the effect of changes i

松果

Asymmetry and Corrective Public Policyor rent-avoidance efforts) are spent by interest groups that attempt to influence the outcome of the political decision-making process in their favor. The outcome of this process is usually uncertain. When some inefficient public policy is proposed, for example, because of some effective political c

有節(jié)制

觀察

就職

Privatizationion, the effects of privatization, the extent of its success, and the possible reasons for the failure of different privatization methods. This chapter does not deal with these aspects, but rather with the political struggle among the various interest groups involved in privatization. Chronologicall

MANIA

Migration Policy see for example, Benhabib (1996), Borjas (1994), (1995), Gang and Rivera-Batiz (1994), Schmidt, Stilz, and Zimmermann (1994), Zimmermann (1995) and more recently, Boeri, Hanson and McCormick (2002). One thing is apparent, except in unusual circumstances, Western countries tend to spend significant

大廳

增強(qiáng)

Surgical Anatomy of the Paranasal Sinuseso face the challenge of taking into account economic as well as political factors. Regardless of the institutional and political setting, such factors seem to be essential to the plausibility of such a theory.

燕麥

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2059-7ing politicians who approve or reject the proposed price. The producer is interested in securing the rent associated with the approval of the proposed price while the consumers prefer that the proposed price be rejected, thus avoiding a reduction in their surplus.

Generosity

PGPR in Management of Soil Toxicity,icant role of the agenda setters as well as the important role of the actual decision makers, the politicians. The dichotomous nature of the decisions made by the politicians (approve or reject) and the dual nature of the public decision-making process that consists of . proposals and . approval of these proposals are also taken into account.