Titlebook: Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics; Johan De Smedt,Helen De Cruz Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Gene culture evolution

Fixate

書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics網絡公開度




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics被引頻次




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics年度引用




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics讀者反饋




書目名稱Empirically Engaged Evolutionary Ethics讀者反饋學科排名

Type-1-Diabetes

The Chimpanzee Stone Accumulation Ritual and the Evolution of Moral Behaviorance to high-ranking male abuse via a set of creative moral behaviors. This has implications for homologous behaviors descending from the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees, ca. 7–12?million years ago, and for hypothesizing stages in the evolution of morality and ethics in human and other spe

DEBT

Morality as an Evolutionary Exaptationther suggest that moral cognition is likely not a biological adaptation. Instead, like reading sheet music or riding a bicycle, moral cognition is something that individuals . to do—in this case, in response to sociocultural norms created in our ancestral history and passed down through the ages to

pacifist

Against the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality: Deconstructing a Philosophical Mythe of their peculiar authority will not be available. This claim is an unexpected survival of a basic tenet of moral realism, namely, that moral norms derive their authority from objective realities. It is unfortunate to see this claim survive in evolutionary ethicists. They should rather embrace the

使高興

繼承人

Book 2021evolution of morality do make a difference, and asks how. It presents original essays by authors from various disciplines, including philosophy, anthropology, developmental psychology, and primatology, who write in conversation with neuroscience, sociology, and cognitive psychology..

繼承人

debacle

miracle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75389-3ther suggest that moral cognition is likely not a biological adaptation. Instead, like reading sheet music or riding a bicycle, moral cognition is something that individuals . to do—in this case, in response to sociocultural norms created in our ancestral history and passed down through the ages to

landmark

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96700-8e of their peculiar authority will not be available. This claim is an unexpected survival of a basic tenet of moral realism, namely, that moral norms derive their authority from objective realities. It is unfortunate to see this claim survive in evolutionary ethicists. They should rather embrace the