Titlebook: Emotional Life and the Politics of Welfare; Paul Haggett,Jo Campling Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limi

自戀

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45606-4inking about the darker side of group life. Specifically I want to explore something that has been an almost constant feature of my experience of groups which start out with a radical political or cultural intent, that is, their underlying conservatism. I do not think that this is a particular featu

Host142

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8058-7olland who had been trained at the Tavistock Clinic as an adult psychotherapist and who was a long-time Maoist. The project, the Battersea Action and Counselling Centre, combined community action and various forms of therapeutic interventions, particularly brief psychotherapy with individuals in dis

AVID

態(tài)度暖昧

prosthesis

Unreasonable Subjects,he idea of common welfare draws attention to the intrinsic dignity and value of a society’s citizens irrespective of their economic function, a welfare society can represent a different kind of social order, one in which decommodifying effects are maximised (Esping-Anderson, 1990). Thus while much i

badinage

Mobilising Fictions,ter 2, there is now such an emphasis upon deconstruction and difference that any attempt to talk about what people experience in common runs the risk of being considered a ‘homogenising disourse’. Reading the book . (Leonard, 1997) I was struck by the hesitant way in which even someone with a histor

厭食癥

Hatred of Dependency,oggett & Lousada, 1985). Our belief was that you couldn’t address the emotional distress of people living in the area without tackling the social deprivation which was a part of their everyday lives. But we also believed that political action to fight injustice needed to be informed by a vision of h

缺乏

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48876-7he idea of common welfare draws attention to the intrinsic dignity and value of a society’s citizens irrespective of their economic function, a welfare society can represent a different kind of social order, one in which decommodifying effects are maximised (Esping-Anderson, 1990). Thus while much i

GULP

Pal?omagnetismus und Arch?omagnetismuster 2, there is now such an emphasis upon deconstruction and difference that any attempt to talk about what people experience in common runs the risk of being considered a ‘homogenising disourse’. Reading the book . (Leonard, 1997) I was struck by the hesitant way in which even someone with a histor

清唱?jiǎng)?/a>

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8058-7oggett & Lousada, 1985). Our belief was that you couldn’t address the emotional distress of people living in the area without tackling the social deprivation which was a part of their everyday lives. But we also believed that political action to fight injustice needed to be informed by a vision of h