Titlebook: Emmanuel Levinas; The Problem of Ethic Edith Wyschogrod Book 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1974 Edmund Husserl.Emmanuel Lév

CHORD

書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas被引頻次




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas年度引用




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas讀者反饋




書目名稱Emmanuel Levinas讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

別名

From Self to Same,ss in its various spheres of operation. The work of the-matization presupposes existing entities, a world; it presupposes “consciousness of” the relation with an object, with what is posited. Levinas does not question the methodological adequacy of phenomenology, its power to uncover the structure o

哎呦

知道

Beyond Temporality,he field of cognition. In these phenomena something remains extrinsic to self; an alterity persists which cannot be reduced to the same. The self-evidence of these phenomena is unimpeachable, yet they cannot be incorporated into an established frame of reference or interiorized through subsumption u

aqueduct

ARIA

ARIA

Conclusions,they fail to take into account their origin in a lifeworld which lies outside the jurisdiction of the methods which they use and from which these methods derive. In this respect Levinas’ thought is continuous with that of Husserl. But the failure of science and history in Levinas’ view, lies not onl

CHART

戲服

Mitgliedschaft, Zwecke und Hierarchien,ion with an object, with what is posited. Levinas does not question the methodological adequacy of phenomenology, its power to uncover the structure of cognition, the relation of consciousness to all positing. But at the heart of Levinas’ thought is the question: does thematizing consciousness exhaust the data of all experiencing?

松軟