Titlebook: Emerson‘s Literary Philosophy; Reza Hosseini Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springe

鉤針織物

Schur Analysis in an Indefinite Settingson a future?” or “What kind of writing has Emerson produced?”—that is, questions concerning his relevance to the kinds of questions and concerns we face today. In this regard, one might think of his capacity to re-mystify the ordinary, of his literary achievements, or of his pioneering role as Amer

要求比…更好

Bergman Kernel in Complex Analysis,e about their basic beliefs. But Socrates was after something far more fundamental. He saw . as a prelude to a search for ., commonly translated as “virtue” or “excellence.” There are at least two narratives on the impacts of the Socratic method on his interlocutors. The first group argues that . is

Root494

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3679-3r of Emerson seems to be left alone with the challenge of coming to a point for herself. But she is not utterly left alone. I examine Emerson’s scattered remarks about his style, I take a clue from F. O. Matthiessen, and then I argue that the problem of Emerson’s prose is the manifestation of a key

巨碩

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10952-5 “The American Scholar” but less to his remarks about the “pale scholar.” In this chapter, I focus on the latter and argue that understanding the evolving nature of Emerson’s views about what counts for action could not only deepen our understanding of his philosophy and its orientation toward the c

廚師

acheon

expunge

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04909-4 of Emerson’s poetry (e.g., in poems such as “Saadi” or “Bacchus”). What is less developed and fleshed out is the extent to which not only Emerson’s poetry but also his prose, from . (1836) to . (1870), corresponds to questions and concerns that shaped the overall orientation of Persian literary hum

天真

情感

Introduction,hole and establish his contribution to some of the ongoing discussions among contemporary philosophers. The main questions of the book are: What would an Emersonian view add to the tradition of philosophy as a way of life? What could his writings contribute to the literature on life’s meaning among

口味

Socrates and Emerson on ,r beyond the acknowledgment of inconsistency in one’s argument or .. If the arguments of the second group withstand scrutiny, then I suggest that the Socratic project can be supplemented with what I call the Emersonian method of enquiry, one that aims at a fundamental ., which is as important a prec