Titlebook: Embodying Democracy; Electoral System Des Sarah Birch,Frances Millard,Kieran Williams Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

閘門

書目名稱Embodying Democracy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Embodying Democracy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Embodying Democracy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Embodying Democracy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Embodying Democracy被引頻次




書目名稱Embodying Democracy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Embodying Democracy年度引用




書目名稱Embodying Democracy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Embodying Democracy讀者反饋




書目名稱Embodying Democracy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

碎石

捐助

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99000-7ven to the factors that shape them in the early stages of their development or the ways in which they evolve. A number of democratic countries made changes to their electoral laws in the 1990s, belying the view that ‘fundamental changes are rare and arise only in extraordinary situations’.. Yet the

penance

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20936-9litical system. Unusually, the law changed for three out of four elections (1991, 1993, 2001). Nor can the revisions introduced for the 2001 elections be viewed as final. Indeed, as Olechowski’s view above shows, even basic premises of electoral system design remained contested. Here we provide an o

地名表

使饑餓

使饑餓

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50740-31990. The main principles of the provisional electoral law adopted prior to the first post-authoritarian election were maintained in legislation adopted by the first democratically elected parliament in 1991–2, and few changes were introduced thereafter (see Table 5.1). Romania has a bicameral parli

同謀

爵士樂(lè)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2253-8pose the system of his choice in 1993, did he choose a mixed system, and why, given the circumstances under which this system was imposed, was it not subsequently changed by parliament? This chapter will argue that a combination of high levels of uncertainty and multiple aims account for the adoptio

Prognosis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52707-8nevertheless considerable legislative activity in the electoral sphere. Like Poland and Russia, Ukraine adopted new electoral laws for each election after 1989, and each law was preceded by lengthy debates reflecting many basic issues of post-communist change. Principal among them was the proper rel