Titlebook: Elites, Ideas, and the Evolution of Public Policy; William Genieys,Marc Smyrl Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America I

TERRA

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-36455-0word, the meaning we have in mind when we scornfully say, “oh, that’s just politics” in order to explain why a dubious measure made its way into the federal budget or why a colleague less deserving than ourselves got the coveted office closest to the coffeemaker. Why did a senior senator insert a bi

fatty-acids

Normen, Normzahlen und Passungenity of stable interests, of which the revealed preferences of actors are but imperfect reflections, may be intellectually satisfying and, in some cases, theoretically useful but provides little guidance for the questions that concern us here. Open-minded empirical observation, instead, provides us w

MAG

不能平靜

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25356-4nition of the national interest—and the distinction between external permissive causes and endogenous policy development. Golob and Joana present cases that lie squarely at the intersection of public policy and international relations—“high” and “l(fā)ow” politics, as it were. External trade policy in C

milligram

熱心助人

,über die Herstellung von Zeichnungen,nd dynamics of policy change with which we began. In addition, a number of the studies suggest the outline of a further research program, one focused on a particular mechanism of change: the role of programmatic elites. This last, we must stress, is not intended as a universal answer to the question

清唱?jiǎng)?/a>

初次登臺

Elites, Ideas, and the Evolution of Public Policy978-0-230-61299-0Series ISSN 2945-6452 Series E-ISSN 2945-6460

極大的痛苦

The Problem of Policy Change,considering their impact on her own life, sees an image of constant flux. New laws are passed and regulations enforced; individuals seeking to gain or retain elected office promise “reform”; specialists, inside government and out, engage in passionate public debate about the relative merits of vario

民間傳說