Titlebook: Elite-Mass Relations in Communist Systems; Daniel N. Nelson Book 1988 Daniel N. Nelson 1988 communism.political science.political theory.p

hauteur

充氣球

掙扎

hazard

,Einführung in den deutschen Strommarkt,heir most consistent opposition among the people they rule to arise from the supposedly revolutionary stratum of industrial labor. This development needs to be investigated. In this chapter, I undertake a comparison of workers in the politics of Romania, Poland and Yugoslavia — notwithstanding their

直覺好

Methoden zur Marktmachtanalyse,pants. Political scientists whose emphasis is American politics do, of course, study the Presidency, Congress and the Supreme Court — but there have also been decades of study of American political behavior (voting and public opinion, for example), public administration and policy analysis, and many

Water-Brash

Stichproben in der Marktforschung,e emergence of Solidarity, Chernenko’s succession of Andropov, the level of and rate of growth in Soviet military spending, the degree to which Maoism would outlast Mao, the survivability of Yugoslavia after Tito — these are but a few of the major changes in communist party states about which many analysts have erred.

conscience

Introduction: An Approach to Studying Communist Politics,e emergence of Solidarity, Chernenko’s succession of Andropov, the level of and rate of growth in Soviet military spending, the degree to which Maoism would outlast Mao, the survivability of Yugoslavia after Tito — these are but a few of the major changes in communist party states about which many analysts have erred.

蒸發(fā)

Dilemmas of Local Politics,rom a conviction that the successes or failures of communist governments at . levels, where contact with the citizenry is most frequent and most salient, will be a key determinant of the long-term prognosis for such systems.

Ceramic

猛然一拉

Leninists and Political Inequalities,in policy making, and thus exist in all polities. But Marxism, more than any other modern political notion, raises the promise of socio-economic and political ‘progress’, usually seen as greater equality. In that emphasis on equality lies the presumed intimacy between party and people, between élites and masses.