Titlebook: Electoral Dynamics in Britain since 1918; William L. Miller Book 1977 William L. Miller 1977 campaign.constituency.election.election campa

tariff

Abbreviate

BRINK

Units, Measures and Methods for Longer Term Analysis,particular parties the major/minor distinction is not relevant for the long term. So one priority must be to develop some method of analysis which can cope with three parties without introducing arbitrary distinctions between them.

Painstaking

Coterminous

Basic Voting Patterns at a Post-War Election: 1966,egister at this election voted out of a possible 93% for an election in March. So while something must be said about Liberal voting and turnout it is reasonable to simplify our analysis by concentrating on the Labour versus Conservative division of the vote.

aspersion

可轉(zhuǎn)變

Units, Measures and Methods for Longer Term Analysis,sible to ignore the Liberals and unsatisfactory to compartmentalise the analysis into Conservative versus Labour and Liberal versus the rest. Yet the Liberals never gained as much as 12% of votes cast. In 1929 they took twice that percentage and in 1974 well over one and a half times. At a certain l

災(zāi)難

,Basic Social Alignments 1918–74,d from any pre-war election. Because of the impact of religion and nationalism it is necessary to restrict this chapter to England. England included about 85% of the British Electorate and 83% of parliamentary seats. Table 1 shows the English trends in seats contested, party votes and turnout from 1

鐵砧

食物