Titlebook: Electing the French President; The 1995 Presidentia Robert Elgie (Lecturer in Politics) Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmill

mutineer

The 1995 Presidential Election Campaigns,ly chose in a ‘rational’ way, as Habert and Lancelot have suggested,2 their changes of preferences during the campaign explain not only why the . passed from Edouard Balladur to Jacques Delors to Chirac, but also why the poll predictions for the first ballot proved so inexact.

colony

KEGEL

Painstaking

; it also places Chirac‘s election in the context of some of the more longstanding issues and debates in contemporary French politics, examining the Fifth Republic‘s institutional structures, the behaviour of its political parties, the attitudes of its citizens and the nature of its governance.978-0-333-63085-3978-1-349-25033-2

cocoon

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/305612.jpg

reserve

The Haunting of Hill House (2018)rench social and political structures. The euphoria of his socialist supporters, not fearing to call their programme ., was matched only by the fear of his right-wing opponents as to the havoc which the ‘a(chǎn)lliance socialo-communiste’ would wreak. Fourteen years on, the apocalyptic atmosphere had long

沖擊力

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275126tial election, the features which distinguished the 1995 campaign from earlier campaigns and the methods by which Jacques Chirac won. Its concerns are the strategies adopted by the candidates and the resources and methods employed. The data are mainly derived from published sources, notably newspape

合群

,Introduction: Death’s Own Backyard,encompasses the work of writers as famous and as diverse as Montesquieu, Bagehot, Ostrogorski and Weber. In France, the institutionalist tradition is exemplified by Maurice Duverger’s pioneering work in the early 1950s on political parties, electoral systems and party systems.1 More recently it may

廢除

Gothic Landscapes in Mary Butts’s ,est. In accordance with the analytical framework established in Chapter 3, party programmes, campaign issues and the attitude of the electorate are identified only when they illustrate the ways in which parties and candidates are constrained by the tension between three pairs of opposites — party an

彩色的蠟筆

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333985236campaigns. Each candidate must mobilise internal party support while simultaneously meeting the conflicting but requisite demands of personalisation and wider inter-party alliances (see Chapter 3). This chapter examines how candidates on the left managed such competing pressures at the presidential