Titlebook: Egalitarianism and Global Justice; From a Relational Pe Kevin K. W. Ip Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 globa

憂傷

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08047-1This chapter contains a discussion of ideal theorizing in radically non-ideal circumstances. If there is anything all political theorists working in the field of global justice would agree on, it will be the claim that the world we are living in is grossly unjust.

gusher

Introduction,This chapter contains a review of the recent literature on global equality and an overview of the book.

muffler

Androgen

退潮

MIRTH

讓你明白

Equality and Special Relations of Cooperation,lly, it argues that there is an alternative justificatory approach through which political coercion can be justified without reference to people’s distributive shares and therefore one can reject the statist conclusion without denying that political coercion needs to be justified to those who are su

賠償

Equality and the Significance of Nationality,re can be no appropriate metric for egalitarian justice to work beyond the context of a national community because a shared national culture is required to give content to the requirements of egalitarian justice. Second, it considers the dynamic problem argument, which maintains that egalitarian red

Ebct207

Responsibility for Global Justice: Agents, Distribution, and Demandingness,a is that various agents, including both individual and collective entities, should be responsible for bringing about just outcomes, and the content of their responsibilities will depend on their respective position in the global order. Then it considers the underlying principles that should guide t

高興去去