找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Egalitarian Rights Recognition; A Political Theory o Matt Hann Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Hannah Arendt

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 減輕
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 13:04:11 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:10:19 | 只看該作者
2662-6039 nsidering human rights as intrinsic because we are human.Ori.This book takes a distinctive and innovative approach to a relatively under-explored question, namely: Why do we have human rights? Much political discourse simply proceeds from the idea that humans have rights because they are human witho
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:48:57 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:51:03 | 只看該作者
Book 2016scourse simply proceeds from the idea that humans have rights because they are human without seriously interrogating this notion. .Egalitarian Rights Recognition. offers an account of how human rights are created and how they may be seen to be legitimate: rights are created through social recognitio
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 02:50:59 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:27:22 | 只看該作者
Thomas Hill Green and the Social Recognition of Rights,en. It introduces Green’s work on rights in the twin contexts of Hegel’s work on recognition and the natural rights tradition, and argues that one of his crucial achievements was to combine these two literatures. The chapter argues that, within Green’s work, there are two forms of recognition: the r
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:18:03 | 只看該作者
Hannah Arendt: The Rights of Man, the Political Community, Judgment and Recognition,ibution to the literature criticising natural rights; her experience as a stateless person provides a compelling addition to previous theoretical arguments against natural rights. Further, her conception of the ‘right to have rights’ is important, and supportable, and that it is in many ways analogo
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:01:49 | 只看該作者
Societies of Rights: What Does a Political Community Look Like?,ognition requires meaningful equality, which can be expressed as ‘equality of access to rights recognition arenas and debates’, as well as freedom of communication within a society. The second half of the chapter makes the case for rights as recognised claims, rather than established ways of acting,
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:54:15 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:53:00 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-27 01:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
南昌市| 杭锦后旗| 山东| 攀枝花市| 德惠市| 赤城县| 临城县| 维西| 古浪县| 修文县| 沙洋县| 双江| 始兴县| 鹿邑县| 兴安盟| 永年县| 南雄市| 遂宁市| 河西区| 松原市| 宁津县| 伽师县| 德格县| 刚察县| 和龙市| 武胜县| 怀集县| 百色市| 乌恰县| 康保县| 沐川县| 北京市| 天长市| 红安县| 丽江市| 高清| 高邑县| 米易县| 敖汉旗| 通江县| 达日县|