Titlebook: Educating the Reasonable; Political Liberalism Frodo Podschwadek Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

改良

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84021-1Educating the Reasonable; An Exercise in Public Reason; Rawisian Education; Political Virtues; Same-Sex

Relinquish

不透明

Service Development and Operation,This chapter summarises the theoretical arguments of the chapters in Part I and the practical arguments from the chapters in Part II of this book and concludes that, while the account of political liberal education provided in this book might not be the only possible one, it is at least a plausible and robust one.

他日關(guān)稅重重

Somber

MURKY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41784-0ng an overview of the sparse occasions where Rawls himself writes about the relevance of these concepts for liberal education and then discusses the three major claims about education that can be found there: the idea of political liberal minimal civic education and its aims, the development of a se

GRATE

金哥占卜者

Product Tracking and WEEE Managementical liberal education. Political liberalism rejects any reliance on substantive conceptions of autonomy which are connected to comprehensive ethical views that are not necessarily shared by all reasonable citizens. Instead, political liberalism insists on so-called political autonomy of individuals

我還要背著他

Cloud-Based Design and Manufacturing (CBDM)ority relations over children’s education. While Rawls refers to rights repeatedly in his political theory, the underlying conception of rights he has in mind remains fuzzy and is therefore not very helpful to resolve conflicts of authority between parents and the state over the education of childre

obstinate

Interpreting an Image: Classificationeducation. The role of public reason is particularly important in this context, as many political liberals appear to have a tendency to dismiss religious concerns about the effects of certain types of public education as based on comprehensive reasons and therefore not suitable for justificatory arg