Titlebook: Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist; Donata Romizi,Monika Wulz,Elisabeth Nemeth Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

connoisseur

ADAGE

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370333distinguished place in the field of history and sociology of science – after their rediscovery. This chapter describes and analyzes in detail Zilsel’s American years, his contacts with refugee help organizations, philanthropic foundations and fellow refugee scholars. It is argued that Zilsel lacked

截斷

Biofeedback

hegemony

高射炮

豎琴

frozen-shoulder

Yvonne Winfildah Takawira-Matwaya14) and . (1918), they responded to the wide-spread glorification of exceptional personalities in European literary, biographical and academic culture, especially in the humanities. Both considered the negative socio-political effects, like anti-Semitic and racist tendencies, that the cult of person

刺穿

David W. Hawman,Thomas E. Morrisonn of Genius”. For this purpose, I suggest a rereading of . (1918) in connection with and in analogy to its philosophical roots and contexts in the historical Enlightenment discourse. I try to point out that Zilsel not only considers the “Religion of Genius” as a rather dubious socio-cultural phenome

商品

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65882-7 with Alexandre Koyré’s interpretation of the scientific revolution—understood in the context of the 1940s-1950s as a genuine epistemological interpretation—they also characterized the Zilsel thesis as a purely sociological thesis that does not contribute much to the epistemological understanding of