Titlebook: Economics As Discourse; An Analysis of the L Warren J. Samuels Book 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990 economics.mathematic

善辯

恃強(qiáng)凌弱

malapropism

companion

forager

Hermeneutics, Subjectivity, and the Lester/Machlup Debate: Toward a More Anthropological Approach t that shows us what understanding is, how it happens, and what it depends on, this question can be rephrased: How well do economists understand understanding? What difference would it make to our scholarly practices if economics were to become more hermeneutically sophisticated in this respect?

直覺沒有

genesis

The Textbook Presentation of Economic Discourse,mulas does not make much sense. Even though they are constantly bombarded with abstractions in their cultural environment, the thinking in abstract terms that economists do is not natural to most students. The incongruity with common talk makes economics hard.

BET

珊瑚

Biochemistry of Brain and Behavior(1966) terminology. They are conceptual frameworks by which order is imposed upon, and moral legitimacy accorded to, the raw stuff out of which social understanding must be forged (Heilbroner, 1973; 1985, Chapter 5; and 1988, Chapters 1 and 8.)

定點(diǎn)