找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Economic Justice; Philosophical and Le Helen M. Stacy,Win-Chiat Lee Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013 Economic Just

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 預(yù)兆前
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:48:17 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:55:13 | 只看該作者
Poverty, Markets, Justice: Why the Market Is the Only Cure for Povertyertain to fail to benefit the very people it is intended to benefit. Philanthropic assistance should be limited to disaster relief, such as tsunamis, where voluntary private help works brilliantly – and local governments impede it hugely.
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:31:28 | 只看該作者
Some Remarks on Hume’s Account of Property Including One Cheer for the Communist Manifestodividualistic theory of society. The paper concludes with a discussion of the creative destruction (Schumpeter’s term) described by Marx and Engels as a basic characteristic of industrial capitalism. It ends by pointing out a basic error in Marx’s account that Hume had no difficulty avoiding.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:46:54 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:55:59 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:08:21 | 只看該作者
Baustellenmanagement im Anlagenbauing but value-neutral. The decision procedure is best suited to self-interested individuals determined to do as well for themselves as they can, and among its predictable results are certain character traits that are less than fully praiseworthy and economic inequalities that, given those traits, grow significantly worse as the process continues.
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:59:00 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:16:11 | 只看該作者
Baustoffe für tragende Bauteilepen ended, content. Indeed, a strong argument for redistribution is that, unless property is qualified in such a way that it does not automatically rule out redistributive taxation, property cannot be defended.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:35:39 | 只看該作者
Economic Justice in the Oikos: Freedom and Equality in Family Law no injustice arises from differences in benefits. This holding is supported by the argument in this chapter that it makes sense to claim that drawing the distinction on the basis of marriage respects human dignity.
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 02:15:15 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-21 03:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
石屏县| 偃师市| 浦江县| 开原市| 商丘市| 阳谷县| 塔河县| 巨野县| 普兰店市| 酉阳| 汶上县| 华坪县| 思南县| 四会市| 安乡县| 搜索| 古田县| 米泉市| 巴南区| 长岭县| 新昌县| 石家庄市| 新绛县| 贡觉县| 阆中市| 台南市| 宁远县| 湖北省| 江川县| 盖州市| 新平| 西昌市| 林西县| 榆社县| 连平县| 邹平县| 长宁区| 兴仁县| 大城县| 霍州市| 邹城市|