Titlebook: Economic Assessment of Election Programmes; Does it make sense? Johan J. Graafland,Arie P. Ros Book 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

反復(fù)無(wú)常

支架

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49578-1 by the independent CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB). This bureau was founded by Jan Tinbergen, with the explicit aim to increase the understanding of the workings of the economy without any inference of political norms.1 By building models to calculate such workings, the in

diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95441-7PB) assists the government with assessing the consequences of economic policy. In addition, CPB calculates the economic consequences of party programmes before each election for parliament. The main objective of this chapter is to provide a rationale for the latter practice.

他一致

The External Configuration of the Heart,ammes, or of economic policy in general, are not under discussion. The significance that is usually attributed to CPB research illustrates the very dominant position of the economy in present-day politics. The part the impact calculus plays in the elections is largely determined by the prestige econ

賞錢

D. Bradley,S. Dyke,Robert J. Codyves. Probably this is not just modesty. Secretly the adviser of the prince cherishes the ambition to exercise more power or influence than those who decorate the public scene themselves, and this is even true for free-marketeers rejecting almost all government intervention in economic life. This bac

magenta

Clear Cell Hepatocellular Carcinoma,e assessment effort by CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB hereafter). It is not our aim to give a full representation of the different views expressed during the conference. This is a summary exercise, presenting the outline of the argument and the main oppositions.

吞沒(méi)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27241-8etherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (CPB). Dependent on the political setting, the CPB analysis occasionally has had a significant impact on the political scene. For example, in 1998 the analysis of CPB showed that the CDA’s proposed policies would hardly foster employment. This became a

吃掉

用手捏

Macro Models as Workhorseshat agent A’s decisions depend on agent B’s plans. Post-Keynesians, a radical Keynesian school, gave a similar argument — but from a very different perspective. Both lines of thought are/were however not supported at a large scale, contrary to the third one, the new-classical critique, which is cert

arcane