Titlebook: Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis; Peter Self Textbook 1975Latest edition Macmillan Publ

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:44:39

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis影響因子(影響力)

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis被引頻次

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis被引頻次學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis年度引用

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis年度引用學(xué)科排名

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis讀者反饋

書目名稱Econocrats & the Policy Process: The Politics & Philosophy of Cost-Benefit Analysis讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:03:49

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:45:33

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:05:56

apricious or unreasoning and lacks consistent preferences? The short answer of course is that one can only give a man his preferences to the extent that he has any, and the analyst must do his best with the data available.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:38:30

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16155-1 general models of decision-making. These are no more than loose logical frameworks, but they help to illustrate some basic problems about the choice of different methodologies for reaching decisions.*

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:33:58

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:44:25

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:47:38

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:37:16

Planning and Cost-Benefit general models of decision-making. These are no more than loose logical frameworks, but they help to illustrate some basic problems about the choice of different methodologies for reaching decisions.*

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:42:54

		自動(dòng)登錄	找回密碼
密碼			To register

關(guān)于派博傳思			派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站			友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹	公司地理位置	論文服務(wù)流程	影響因子官網(wǎng)	吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng)	大講堂	北京大學(xué)	Oxford Uni.	Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革	期刊點(diǎn)評(píng)	投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)	SCIENCEGARD	IMPACTFACTOR	派博系數(shù)	清華大學(xué)	Yale Uni.	Stanford Uni.
\|Archiver\|手機(jī)版\|小黑屋\| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 17:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved