Titlebook: Ecologies of Guilt in Environmental Rhetorics; Tim Jensen Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

Isolate

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245112ctive guilt can be a powerful individualizing force. Through analysis of public relations campaigns and marketing, I illustrate how corporations have intentionally employed rhetorics of personal responsibility to contain political pressure and diffuse demands for more corporate accountability. The s

Entrancing

acetylcholine

Animal Species for Developmental Studieserweaving of guilt, grief, and mourning, we risk feelings of ecological grief remaining individualized, unresolved, and unarticulated, resulting in a form of melancholia. Analysis of the film . by artist Chris Jordan reveals a constructive approach to environmental grief and, by extension, I argue,

radiograph

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3654-3ldo Leopold’s land ethic, I propose redefining environmental guilt as .. When approached as a resource and teacher, environmental guilt can guide us toward ecological connection and care. In order to transform environmental guilt’s affective pull toward reconciliation and reparation, however, I cont

生氣的邊緣

和藹

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05651-3Climate Change Communication; Climate Change; Guilt; Environmental Rhetoric; Environmental Realism; Envir

武器

小隔間

pacifist

2634-6451 al literacies that help us navigate complicity in a collecti.Environmental rhetorics have expanded awareness of mass extinction, climate change, and pervasive pollution, yet failed to generate collective action that adequately addresses such pressing matters. This book contends that the anemic respo

convulsion

Animal Research and Ethical Conflict as well as the challenges presented in doing so. I propose an ecological approach to the study of guilt—in both metaphorical and material terms—because through improved engagement with environmental guilt we can be more effective in addressing our ecological crisis.