Titlebook: Ecologically Unequal Exchange; Environmental Injust R. Scott Frey,Paul K. Gellert,Harry F. Dahms Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

exigent

Welfare, Rights, and Pragmatism,azil that Stephen Bunker focused on in his fieldwork to develop the concept of ecologically unequal exchange. This difference resulted from unique aspects of Chinese geography and geology, as well as China’s response to imperialism from the late nineteenth century. Nor did the so-called resource cur

爵士樂

defenses

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10769-8ocusing on the lead-up to and aftermath of the 2015 Paris negotiations. We identify and discuss three areas of tension that have emerged within the G-77 coalition: tensions within the global semi-periphery, tensions between the semi-periphery and periphery, and tensions within the periphery. Togethe

indoctrinate

協(xié)議

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89740-0Ecological inequality; Ecology; environmental sociology; ecological exchange; globalization; social justi

Magnitude

越自我

R. Scott Frey,Paul K. Gellert,Harry F. DahmsAssesses the theory of Ecologically Unequal Exchange from a world-system approach.Reflects critically on the foundational insights of Stephen G Bunker.Uses an energy-based accounting of unequal exchan

LASH

Euthyroid

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2184-2production processes and wastes to, the Global South (Frey, Gellert, and Dahms 2017; Hornborg and Martinez-Alier 2016; Jorgenson 2016a, 2016b; Jorgenson and Clark 2009a). These unequal relations underscore a large ecological debt owed to the periphery by the core countries; this debt is a key source

Encumber