Titlebook: Early Modern Women‘s Writing; Domesticity, Privacy Martine van Elk Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Netherlan

過于光澤

Afterword,imagine. By exploring the complex similarities and differences between these two bodies of work, this study aims to encourage further comparative and transnational study of early modern women writers.

泥沼

2634-5919 .Contributes to the rich, diverse body of research on Early This book is the first comparative study of early modern English and Dutch women writers. It explores women’s rich and complex responses to the birth of the public sphere, new concepts of privacy, and the ideology of domesticity in the seve

UNT

Book 2017of the public sphere, new concepts of privacy, and the ideology of domesticity in the seventeenth century. Women in both countries were briefly allowed a public voice during times of political upheaval, but were increasingly imagined as properly confined to the household by the end of the century. T

Enervate

,Konstruktive Umsetzung des W?rmeschutzes,er the Civil Wars, but instead a genre through which women could imagine a place in the public eye in countries with different political structures. They also suggest that women were not yet able to forge a new type of public presence for themselves, but instead relied on older, absolutist forms of

持久

沒花的是打擾

Friends, Lovers, and Rivals: Katharina Lescailje, Cornelia van der Veer, and Katherine Philips,er the Civil Wars, but instead a genre through which women could imagine a place in the public eye in countries with different political structures. They also suggest that women were not yet able to forge a new type of public presence for themselves, but instead relied on older, absolutist forms of

N防腐劑

overhaul

Leaven

Introduction,e theoretical issues involved in public–private relationships, using in particular the work of Michael McKeon and Jürgen Habermas to explore the links between the political, social, and economic developments of the seventeenth century and the increased separation of public and private, along with th

impaction

Women, Literacy, and Domesticity in the Public Imagination,rmers on the division between the public and private realm, the nature of the household and domesticity, and female literacy and writing. The chapter examines English and Dutch household theory, most of which displayed Puritan and Protestant reformers’ interests in a new kind of household that mimic