Titlebook: EU Regulatory Decision Making and the Role of the United States; Transatlantic Regula Oliver Ziegler Book 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbade

歡呼

Opponent

NOTCH

Limousine

Fibrillation

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2247-8city. It ranges from large household appliances such as refrigerators and air conditioners, computers and stereo systems, to hand-held digital apparatuses and mobile phones. This equipment often includes hazardous substances, such as lead, mercury, hexavalent chromium, cadmium, and halogenated flame

Chauvinistic

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47479-3l bromide and HCFCs, as soon as possible. By proposing new phase out schedules for the two substances that went beyond internationally set targets of the 1987 Montreal Protocol, EU Environment Commissioner Ritt Bjerregaard underlined her willingness to expand Europe’s frontrunner position on ozone p

urethritis

反叛者

as environmental issues. In contrast to our previous case studies, however, this case is an apt example of how U.S. pressure and a united industry front made prevention- focused regulatory cooperation a success and made U.S. economic interests prevail in the EU’s regulatory decision making process.

驕傲

grounded

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3211-6phasized, “if […] researchers seek to make causal inferences, they should, in principle, be concerned about the larger comparison.” As such, we should assess whether the conclusions of this study can help gain insights into the general process of prevention-focused regulatory cooperation. In order t