Titlebook: EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science; Vassilios Karakostas,Dennis Dieks Conference proceedings 2013 Spri

蹣跚

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3295-5atural kinds and should therefore be eliminated from the vocabulary of scientific psychology. In this paper I examine the perhaps most well known case of scientific eliminativism, Edouard Machery’s concept eliminativism. I argue that the split-lump-eliminate scheme of conceptual change underlying Ma

implore

unt. According to this account, a typical special science law “asserts a certain precisely defined statistical relation among well-defined variables” Earman and Roberts (., 439–478, 1999) and this statistical relation does not require being hedged by ceteris paribus conditions. In this paper, we rai

Benzodiazepines

motor-unit

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0Constitutive mechanistic explanations; Correlation and truth; Deflationism on Scientific Representatio

phytochemicals

978-3-319-34703-5Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Lacunar-Stroke

Doing Away with the No Miracles Argumentists and anti-realists have tied the case for realism to the adequacy of this argument. I argue that it is mistake for realists to let the debate be framed in this way. Realists would be well advised to abandon the NMA altogether and pursue an alternative strategy, which I call the “l(fā)ocal strategy”.

溫室

glisten

EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science

Ovulation

EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science978-3-319-01306-0

綠州

Mechanistic Explanation: Asymmetry Lostsical interpretation of MM, and Craver explicitly commits to constitutive relationships being symmetrical. Other parts of Craver’s writings suggest an epistemological reading. If interpreted in this way, however, namely as a means for individuating mechanisms, MM is arguably redundant.