Titlebook: EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009; Henk W. de Regt,Stephan Hartmann,Samir Okasha Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Netherlands

Aqueous-Humor

旁觀者

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1521-9 which they do so supports a simulationist viewpoint..I will be giving . support to both (i) and (ii). Starting with (i), I will present theoretical and empirical points in support of the view that MNs play a substantial role and are perhaps . although . for understanding at least some intentions or emotions.

occult

HEDGE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25312-0m 1994, 2000), but also takes elements from other authors, mainly from argumentation theory and epistemology. As many philosophers of science that favour an inferential perspective, we see scientific models as inferential tools that help to extract inferences about the target in relation to specific goals.

Watemelon

BLANC

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5402-5a that accompany different philosophical methodologies. I characterize another criterion of adequacy associated with material theories, the avoidance of imported problems, and conclude that one way to reconcile conflicting criteria is to adopt a pluralist stance toward theories of scientific reasoning.

Freeze

Mating Intelligence, Moral Virtues, and Methodological Vices,on. It is argued that the “mating intelligence” theory, as a theory about the evolution of morality, comes too dangerously close to being unfalsifiable because it embodies some auxiliary hypotheses and vague definitions which make it practically immune to every possible empirical finding concerning sex differences in human moral traits.

粗語

Explanation and Modelization in a Comprehensive Inferential Account,m 1994, 2000), but also takes elements from other authors, mainly from argumentation theory and epistemology. As many philosophers of science that favour an inferential perspective, we see scientific models as inferential tools that help to extract inferences about the target in relation to specific goals.

Virtues

Meta-analysis as Judgment Aggregation,apter is to see the extent to which judgment aggregation methods subsume meta-analytic ones. To this end, I derive a generalized version of the classical Condorcet Jury Theorem, and I contend that one can model at least some meta-analytic procedures using this theorem.

ALB

Formal and Material Theories in Philosophy of Science: A Methodological Interpretation,a that accompany different philosophical methodologies. I characterize another criterion of adequacy associated with material theories, the avoidance of imported problems, and conclude that one way to reconcile conflicting criteria is to adopt a pluralist stance toward theories of scientific reasoning.