Titlebook: Dreaming and Memory: Philosophical Issues; Daniel Gregory,Kourken Michaelian Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), un

配置

mettlesome

Die politische Geographie der USAt object and that the properties remembered of the object actually apply to it. Focusing on memories from perceptions—where factivity can indeed be assumed—the two main historical strands in the philosophy of memory, intentionalism and relationalism, disagree, amongst others, over (i) whether memory

不可接觸

虛弱

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-19768-3sed by their attitudes and contents, dreaming seems to involve a variety of attitudes, including beliefs, desires, and more. How do we make sense of dreaming itself as well as its relationship to the attitudes involved? We outline an attitudinal pluralism about dreaming. Attitudinal pluralism is the

Flu表流動(dòng)

dermatomyositis

昏暗

Florian Mildenberger,Bernd Herrmannmbering, not dreaming, if it is underwritten by a cognitive mechanism whose proper function it is to track the truth. The hallmark of states of dreaming is that they aim at something other than truth, such as verisimilitude or interestingness.

尋找

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21248-0ty to represent a distinct spatiotemporal perspective that we do not occupy—for example, when we imagine or recollect events. The first half of the paper compares and contrasts the ways in which this capacity is exercised in imagination and episodic recollection. The second half of the paper draws o

施舍

針葉樹

Rechtsgrundlagen des Umweltschutzes,a new first full English translation of this material, this chapter assesses Halbwachs’ critique of individualism about memory, his scientifically-informed analysis of dream experience, and his ambitious program for a sociological psychology. In work relevant both to contemporary dream science and t