Titlebook: Digital Justice; Engineering Disadvan Linda Mulcahy,Anna Tsalapatanis Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

mountebank

書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Digital Justice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Conduit

orthopedist

Linda Mulcahy,Anna TsalapatanisSpeaks to students and policy-makers interested in access to justice, dispute resolution and digital disadvantage.Provokes debate about the nature of justice in a‘technological age.Presents an evidenc

波動(dòng)

blight

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34269-1ts the many reasons why change was considered necessary and the form it has taken. It examines the problems recent transformations were intended to address as well as the particular values which underpin them. Outlining key themes which are pursued across the book such as the transformation of civic

Expertise

Heike Schützle,Sebastian Brennerips in justice systems. Using civil justice as a case study and drawing on examples from around the world, it focuses on whether technology is primarily being used to substitute paper and other in-person processes for digital or going further to transform the essential nature of how we interact. Mor

Expertise

Erkrankungen des endokrinen System,efficient and accessible but also provides the opportunity to reimagine how we facilitate greater engagement between citizens and the state. The chapter illustrates the urgent need to move away from romanticised accounts of the courtroom as a pseudo-sacred space, which socio-legal accounts of courtr

名字

H. G. Schlack,M. A. Landolt,F. H. Sennhauserus with special places, collective ceremonies, rituals, and materiality. The implications of this will be explored in relation to the significance of co-presence, the engendering of a sense of civic occasion, as well as?the exercise of State power and its impact on the sensory and psychological qual

Intact

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60300-0 of the most disadvantaged users of the legal system, we ask a series of questions about the ways in which the mindset of architects of online justice systems and content providers can be seen as biased. The chapter argues that this is due in large part to a failure to take into account the needs an

妨礙