Titlebook: Dynamic Formal Epistemology; Patrick Girard,Olivier Roy,Mathieu Marion Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Action.Belief.D

傷心

Highlights aus der Wissenschaft,by developing separate theories to account for our conflicting intuitions. This paper shows that the problem can also be addressed through a single theory that allows actions to assessed from different perspectives.

headway

Wolfgang Gentner – Nestor der Arch?ometriel modes of attitudes. As Descartes anticipated, the two primitive modes are those of belief and desire. Complex modes are obtained by adding to primitive modes special cognitive and volitive ways or special propositional content or preparatory conditions.

Aura231

hereditary

預(yù)示

HEAVY

Indeterminacy and Belief Change,ents might be empty. In this case one might use a different approach in cases of indeterminacy. This approach (first proposed in a different form by Isaac Levi in Levi (1986)) has two parts, or tiers. The idea is to first take as admissible any option that is deemed as maximal by some permissible or

引導(dǎo)

Introduction,cation now includes an increasing amount of formal work, utilizing either logic or probabilities. Epistemology has also moved to questions regarding information change, its flow among groups, and its place within interaction, whereas for a long time it was centered mainly on the question of individu

聯(lián)想記憶

Dynamic Epistemic Logic and Temporal Modality,kward-looking modality to the dynamic language, to allow for our expressing statements about what an agent knew before an event took place. This allows us more completely to model what an agent learns from an event, since we can now talk about the difference in their knowledge before and after its o

侵蝕

Exploring the Power of Converse Events,one hand, BMS adds dynamics to epistemic logic by introducing so-called event models as syntactic objects into the language. On the other hand, PDL has instead transition relations between possible worlds. This last approach allows to easily introduce converse events. In this paper we add epistemics

不妥協(xié)

Modal Logic for Qualitative Dynamics,s will conform to the relatively standard analysis of dynamical systems that dates back at least as far as Henri Poincaré’s work on the three-body problem at the end of the 19th century. The modern incarnation of this study, the theory of complex systems, that these days includes chaotic and nonline