Titlebook: Doubting; Contemporary Perspec Michael D. Roth,Glenn Ross Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 epistemology.idea.knowledge.reason.scep

要求比…更好

Metaepistemology and Skepticismgy — metaepistemological questions and normative epistemological questions. The terminology is borrowed from and the distinction parallels the metaethical/normative distinction in ethics. Just as in doing metaethics one is concerned with analyzing concepts fundamental to ethical thought, so in doing

annexation

Skepticism and Rationalitys often influence by provocation. They provoke epistemologists into endorsing metaphysical and linguistic positions that antecedently would have seemed to have had little appeal. Skeptical hypotheses, it is said, cannot even be meaningfully asserted, or if they can, the nature of God or the nature o

Narcissist

Epistemic Universalizability: From Skepticism to Infallibilism be at a party. But Stroud supposes that John. doesn’t show up. Stroud’s claim is that Bill. did not know that John. would show up, even though he is warranted in asserting this.. I have no quarrel with that claim. However, I do want to question the implicit, and widely shared, assumption that had J

多骨

Epistemic Compatibilism and Canonical Beliefsge is possible precisely because they believe, in part, that knowledge does . entail certainty. For they, too, believe that certainty is not possible.. Thus, sceptics and most nousists agree that certainty is not possible.

昏暗

Klein on Certainty and Canonical Beliefsour ordinary beliefs about the world are true.. He calls the set of the most obviously true common-sense beliefs about the world around us “the canon”.. The canon includes beliefs such as that there are tables, there are dogs, and there are trees outside. According to Klein, we can’t know any of the

散布

Two Roads to Skepticisming philosophical ploy: redefining a key term to gain support for a controversial claim. Many skeptics advance their skepticism by redefining what knowledge is, specifically, by raising the standards for knowledge beyond plausibility. This strategy amounts to a low victory by high redefinition — rea

歌唱隊(duì)

Justifying Beliefs: The Dream Hypothesis and Gratuitous Entitiesow road, among whom he identifies defenders of Cartesian skepticism like Barry Stroud, are guilty of setting excessively high and unjustified requirements for knowledge, thereby “redefining what knowledge is”. At worst, they pose a threat to our claims to . things. But shnowing is not knowing. Human

BABY

果核

現(xiàn)暈光

Knowledge in Context, Skepticism in Doubt: The Virtue of Our Facultiesens (assumptions, presumptions, background beliefs, things taken for granted), none of which amount to knowledge. Such convictions may be regarded as “beyond being . or ., as it were, as something ., par. 359). They provide me with “the . of all my enquiring and asserting (par. 162).” This substratu