Titlebook: Distance Relationships; Intimacy and Emotion Mary Holmes Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014 Dist

expansive

Conclusion,ews, or not any more than changes in my own intellectual and personal biography. However, the updates do offer a chance to see the distance relationships anew with the benefit of some degree of hindsight. It becomes clear that for most of the couples, distance relating was an interlude in their live

男生戴手銬

Introduction,ere the one who perhaps made me think most about intimacy in distance relationships. They clearly knew each other very well, having formed a close and apparently loving relationship over about 20 years. When I spoke to them, they had an ease of familiarity with each other, but were also keen to show

inconceivable

Theorising Distance Relationships,even when there is a familial cord, vast gulfs can appear between those sharing a house. I know a story of ancestors who were married for over 40 years, but spent most of those years never speaking. They each had their own butter dish to avoid the need to even ask: ‘Please pass the butter?’ Yet, the

溺愛

Investigating Experiences of Academic-Oriented Distance Relating,he heart of this study. My field notes indicate that the couples I interviewed gave off (Goffman, 1959, p. 14) a certain impression via their body language, and that impression was significant in my analysis (see Heath, 1984), even if sometimes hard to describe or justify. In the example above the i

cornucopia

A Story of Complexity in a Distance Relationship,peras seem tame. The couples in distance relationships whom I interviewed may not resemble a soap opera but do illustrate some of the complexity resulting from a diversification in intimacy and relationships. These changes are outlined in broad terms in chapters 1 and 2, where I have discussed how t

引起

prodrome

無聊的人

空氣傳播

hereditary

10樓