Titlebook: Disentangling Participation; Power and Decision-m Tone Bratteteig,Ina Wagner Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 C

MOTTO

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96409-1an others, as they shape the space for many other decisions. In this chapter we examine how decisions are linked, with some decisions affecting other decisions in unforeseen ways. We also introduce the notion of non-decisions: choices that are made without explicitly deliberating or communicating about them.

音的強(qiáng)弱

征服

連系

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34684-3ntatives, how to organize the design process, how to develop a common ground and mutually learn from each other, how to develop ideas and evaluate them as a multidisciplinary team, etc. The most difficult part, however, is the sharing of power inherent in the PD approach: in order to collaborate wit

左右連貫

全國性

grudging

RAG

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96409-1an others, as they shape the space for many other decisions. In this chapter we examine how decisions are linked, with some decisions affecting other decisions in unforeseen ways. We also introduce the notion of non-decisions: choices that are made without explicitly deliberating or communicating ab

Fallibility

Nieren und ableitende Harnwege,rst point to some of its most salient roots to then highlight aspects of the concept of power that have been developed in different theoretical traditions and are relevant for our analysis. We look more deeply into three aspects of power: how decisions in the two projects were shaped by structural a

清楚

Anna Moker,Prisca Brosi,Isabell M. Welpetory result. We explore this assumption, looking into the kinds of decisions in both projects and into what the participants participated in and how. We think of a participatory result as one that increases users’ ‘power to’. Looking closer into what participants participated in we come to the concl