Titlebook: Discourses of Deficit; Christopher N. Candlin,Jonathan Crichton Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2

AORTA

In-Situ

The Entropy as a Measure of Uncertaintynts from different socio-economic backgrounds, and in different kinds of legal cases, take part as witnesses and/or victims, it remains to be established to what extent an increased access to the legal process has improved their ability to negotiate their way to justice.

figurine

colloquial

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19266-2Prompted by the prestige, high fees and attractiveness of consultancy jobs, talented and hard-working employees are often recruited and many consultancy firms make huge efforts in recruiting, retaining and developing talented people (and ‘letting go’ those viewed as less competent). All this could i

Osmosis

愚蠢人

The Power of Parallel Structurexts — for example, how do ‘deficits’ manifest themselves and who is responsible for the labelling? As Kovarsky and Walsh discuss in this volume, professional discourse constructs communication disorder through textbooks, research and clinical intervention. In this chapter, we will explore key contex

erythema

Introductionays that may affect their life chances. We see ‘deficit’ not as restricted to particular disciplinary formulations or theoretical orientations but as multiply interpretable, depending on the particular locations, research orientations and modes of collaboration between participants and researchers.

mortgage

植物學

Learning and Unlearning Being Guilty: On the Contingent Ascription of a Deficit Categoryetics identified factors that correlate with the probability of actually being deviant (e.g. antisocial behaviour, mental disorder); critical scholars in criminology and sociology identified deficit categories as culturally or socially biased and prejudiced (such as low intelligence); and, thirdly,

ARCH

Categorisations of Child ‘in Need’ and Child ‘in Need of Protection’ and Implications for the Formulow the case should be managed. Typically there are several categories of disposal (Parton .. 1997). First, in the majority of cases no concerns are identified and the case is closed. Second the child is identified as having particular needs which should be addressed, identified as a ‘child in need’,